🔗 Share this article

These days exhibit a very unusual situation: the pioneering US march of the overseers. Their qualifications differ in their expertise and traits, but they all share the identical goal – to avert an Israeli infringement, or even devastation, of the unstable ceasefire. After the hostilities concluded, there have been scant days without at least one of Donald Trump’s envoys on the scene. Just in the last few days saw the likes of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all appearing to execute their duties.

Israel keeps them busy. In only a few short period it executed a wave of strikes in Gaza after the loss of a pair of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) personnel – resulting, according to reports, in many of local casualties. A number of ministers called for a resumption of the war, and the Israeli parliament approved a initial decision to take over the occupied territories. The American reaction was somehow between “no” and “hell no.”

However in various respects, the US leadership appears more intent on preserving the existing, unstable stage of the peace than on moving to the following: the rebuilding of Gaza. When it comes to that, it seems the US may have ambitions but no tangible plans.

At present, it is unknown when the planned multinational governing body will effectively assume control, and the similar applies to the designated military contingent – or even the composition of its soldiers. On Tuesday, a US official declared the US would not dictate the structure of the international contingent on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's government continues to dismiss multiple options – as it did with the Turkish offer lately – what follows? There is also the opposite question: who will decide whether the troops preferred by the Israelis are even interested in the mission?

The issue of how long it will take to neutralize Hamas is similarly unclear. “The expectation in the government is that the international security force is intends to now take charge in neutralizing Hamas,” stated Vance lately. “That’s will require some time.” The former president further emphasized the lack of clarity, declaring in an conversation on Sunday that there is no “fixed” schedule for the group to lay down arms. So, in theory, the unknown participants of this still unformed international contingent could arrive in the territory while the organization's militants still wield influence. Would they be facing a governing body or a insurgent group? These are just a few of the questions arising. Some might wonder what the result will be for average residents as things stand, with Hamas persisting to attack its own opponents and critics.

Recent events have yet again emphasized the gaps of local media coverage on both sides of the Gazan frontier. Every source strives to scrutinize each potential perspective of Hamas’s breaches of the truce. And, usually, the fact that the organization has been hindering the return of the bodies of killed Israeli hostages has taken over the coverage.

On the other hand, reporting of civilian deaths in Gaza stemming from Israeli strikes has garnered scant focus – if at all. Take the Israeli counter strikes after Sunday’s southern Gaza event, in which two troops were lost. While Gaza’s officials stated 44 deaths, Israeli news commentators criticised the “moderate reaction,” which focused on only facilities.

This is typical. Over the past few days, the information bureau alleged Israeli forces of violating the peace with Hamas multiple times after the ceasefire came into effect, causing the death of 38 individuals and harming another many more. The assertion was irrelevant to most Israeli reporting – it was simply missing. This applied to reports that 11 individuals of a Palestinian family were killed by Israeli forces a few days ago.

The emergency services reported the family had been attempting to go back to their home in the Zeitoun area of Gaza City when the transport they were in was attacked for allegedly passing the “boundary” that demarcates zones under Israeli army command. This limit is unseen to the human eye and appears only on charts and in official documents – sometimes not accessible to average individuals in the territory.

Even this occurrence barely received a mention in Israeli media. One source mentioned it briefly on its digital site, quoting an IDF spokesperson who explained that after a questionable transport was identified, forces discharged cautionary rounds towards it, “but the vehicle continued to approach the soldiers in a manner that caused an immediate risk to them. The forces opened fire to eliminate the danger, in accordance with the agreement.” No fatalities were claimed.

Given this perspective, it is no surprise numerous Israelis think Hamas alone is to at fault for breaking the ceasefire. That view could lead to prompting demands for a tougher stance in the region.

Sooner or later – maybe sooner than expected – it will not be enough for American representatives to act as caretakers, telling Israel what to avoid. They will {have to|need